- ■
SanDisk posted $6.20 EPS vs $3.62 expected; revenue $3.03B vs $2.69B forecast. Q3 guidance: $4.4-4.8B revenue and $12-14 EPS (analysts expected $2.93B and $5.11)
- ■
Datacenter business grew 64% sequentially. Expected Q3 gross margins: 65-67% vs. historical 49.3% analyst expectation—margin expansion of 1,500+ basis points
- ■
Raymond James upgraded SanDisk to outperform, noting supply 'potentially sold out for years' as demand 'likely only growing'
- ■
Apple reported Thursday that rising memory prices will impact iPhone production—the constraint just moved upstream to consumer OEMs
SanDisk just crossed the rubicon from commodity memory supplier to supply-constrained margin beneficiary. The company's 71% earnings-per-share beat and guidance nearly double expectations signals that AI infrastructure's appetite for storage is now the dominant market variable. When gross margins expand from 49% expected to 65-67% guidance across the entire sector, it means supply constraint is no longer temporary friction—it's becoming the business model.
Here's what matters right now: SanDisk didn't just beat earnings. The company validated that AI infrastructure's demand for memory storage has fundamentally broken the supply-demand equilibrium, and this isn't a quarterly blip. It's structural.
The numbers tell the story. Datacenter business—the AI-driven segment—grew 64% sequentially. That's not growth. That's emergency procurement. And when demand that intense hits a supply chain already constrained by advanced manufacturing capacity, pricing stops being negotiable.
SanDisk's Q3 gross margin guidance of 65-67% is the inflection point. Analysts were modeling 49.3%. That's a 1,500+ basis point swing. That doesn't happen in a competitive market with supply substitutes. That happens when you control something everyone needs and can't immediately replace.
Raymond James analysts put it plainly: "supply is tightening to the point of potentially being sold out for years." They're not predicting scarcity as a temporary condition. They're modeling it as a multi-year structural feature of the market. That's when memory vendors stop being suppliers and start being toll collectors.
The context matters here. We've been tracking AI infrastructure constraints for months—TSMC's capacity ceiling affecting Apple's advanced node access, memory price escalation hitting enterprise budgets. What SanDisk's earnings reveal is that these weren't isolated pressure points. They're symptoms of a single constraint: the AI infrastructure buildout has exhausted incremental supply.
And here's the cascade effect: constraint at one tier creates constraint at the next. Apple just reported that rising memory prices will force iPhone supply planning decisions. CEO Tim Cook explicitly flagged memory cost pressure as a second-order impact from AI datacenter buildout. That's the constraint moving upstream.
What makes this inflection different from previous memory cycles is the structural demand side. In 2011, memory shortages resolved when Taiwan flooded the market with new fabs. In 2018, the overcorrection crashed prices for two years. Today, the demand signal isn't cyclical (enterprise refresh cycles, consumer upgrade patterns). It's structural: every major cloud provider is building AI inference infrastructure simultaneously. This isn't capacity planning. It's emergency purchasing.
SanDisk's guidance tells you how long this lasts. Q3 revenue guidance of $4.4-4.8B versus $2.93B expected means they're already booked through Q3 at unprecedented margins. They're not predicting demand softening. They're modeling continued supply constraint at least two quarters forward. Raymond James's "potentially sold out for years" comment suggests analysts believe it extends well beyond.
The competitive angle is worth monitoring. SanDisk isn't alone in this margin expansion—SK Hynix and Samsung are benefiting similarly. But SanDisk's datacenter focus is more concentrated than diversified players. That means higher upside, higher downside when supply eventually normalizes.
For different audiences, this creates different decision windows. Enterprise procurement teams need to lock pricing now—within 60 days—before Q2 shortage gets worse. Memory vendors can raise prices quarterly without losing customers (because there are no alternatives). That's unsustainable, but it lasts as long as supply remains constrained. Infrastructure investors should be tracking when first wave of new memory fabs come online (typically 18-24 months after announcement)—that's your margin expansion end date.
SanDisk's earnings are less about the company's execution and more about market structure. Memory supply constraint just became the defining variable in AI infrastructure economics. For investors, this means memory vendors gain 18-24 months of pricing power before new fab capacity online. For enterprise decision-makers, the timing is urgent: secure multi-year memory contracts within 60 days before Q2 shortage pricing kicks in. For builders, understand that memory cost just became a first-order design constraint, not a line-item budget assumption. Watch for the next threshold: first announcement of major new memory fab capacity (Samsung, SK Hynix, or TSMC expansion)—that's your signal the constraint is loosening.





